Responsible response

On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Martin Law <martin.rainbowmaker@gmail.com> wrote:

Thanks,

and correction. What i'm sharing IS directly relevant to anyone who will take a fraction of the 'time', discipline, discernment, and awareness it takes to put it together.

 

If anyone wants to misread it as "too forceful, or (Goddess forbid) "ego driven," or "listen to ME," they've missed the mark and are not paying full attention to what they're reading, the spirit in which it's written, or their own subjective response projected onto it.

Considering that, among a multitude of other uplifting subjects i'm drawing a reader's attention to what actually an 'ego' Is, (an afterthought perpetually becoming a premise. An unquestioned assumption.)

Not as if i just have some axe to grind. It's shared in a playful, non-intellectual manner in the spirit of art.

Besides, if someones house is on fire (which it is) you don't alert people with 'political correctness, do you?

Otherwise, isn't kindness self-evident?  And gentleness apparent and appreciated?  Should be obvious to anyone who's aware, there's 'no ego that might need defending' either.

I recommend anybody to study in depth the whole more than two years' work with an open mind to its diverse approaches and modes, and not form a 'conclusion' which, if it belongs anywhere at all, rightly belongs at the end and not at the outset previous to study.

I can't help what anybody may think and certainly can't tell anybody how they should be, which would be silly, silly ego.

But that's no reason to not be helpful. It's called mutual aid, which is a natural response of all creatures.

How else do you reach people anyway? Particularly the ones with 'a will to ignorance.' Caring and sharing in a climate of scepticism. Life naturally expresses itself (and doesn't need permission, i might add).

P.S. Have a listen to Carl Boudreau, astrology for 2014.

Good vibes~~~~ RBM.~