On Sunday, July 20, 2014, Martin Law
<martin.rainbowmaker@gmail.com> wrote:
'One
showing is worth a thousand words.'
~
Zen saying.
I
just now completed a painting, titled A LIQUID MIRROR. It took
around four days, in five hour sessions on average. I work at a
snail's pace, as the process requires full attention to subtle
exactness. There is nothing dramatic or emotional about it. It's a
form of meditation.
At
this stage, i am familiar with my method as to rarely encounter an
obstacle that i can't resolve. To say i learned the hard way is an
understatement. Probably the best way to learn.
The
worst thing you can do is give up. No chance of that though, as it's
my preferred kind of challenge, endlessly interesting. To abandon
creativity is to embrace self defeat.
Never
lie down on the battlefield or your spirit may abandon you. But it's
an increasingly peaceful battle, no blood, no sweat, no tears, at
all.
That
being so, instead of capitalizing on it, (you can't put a price on
intrinsic worth) i intend to share all of it. I keep the painting,
you gain rare insight into how to do it yourself.
A
gift is something shared, why bring commerce into it ?
The
measure of art is not how quickly you can part with it in exchange
for 'paper.' Or how much paper you can get. Anyway why be in a rush
to part with the embodiment of your spirit's pleasure ? You're
welcome to a print of it for free. A fractal of the source with
essence intact.
So
now i will give you a magic medicine. A distillation of what's going
on here, complete with images, so you can see the process in
progress. There's no loss in simplifying, on the contrary. Because
descriptions always seem more complex than the action itself, till
you get it.
I'm
sharing dependable practical principles of procedure here. Along
with feeling, so forget 'technique'. There is no technique, it's not
a trick, or a knack, and you won't get far with only a mere
technique. Technique is for people whose feeling is not involved,
and active expression is intuitive feeling in action. So...
THE
THREE BASIC COMPONENTS.
~
CONTOUR OUTLINE.
~
SHADOW AREAS.
~
COLOUR/TEXTURE.
Image
number one, CONTOUR OUTLINE.
Simply
the visible boundaries of form. What we tend to call, 'things.'
When we refer to 'things', we're just pointing out portions of the
whole and giving them a name. No 'thing' was ever separate in
reality because no one thing ever existed in isolation, being merely
a concept based on exclusion, or to be exact, ignoring.
Apparent
visible boundaries always have their own uniquely distinct character.
That's an important word. This is what line delineates; the
distinguishing characteristics. Without specifics there's no
character, only vague generalization.
Trees
differ from clouds, or rocks, or creatures,
but
all coexist together in exact relationship, 'by virtue of
one/another', both visually and actually.
So,
in drawing a line, be sure it typifies the thing depicted. This
entails a lot of looking without inner distraction. Just seeing,
without undue effort to 'look.' Attention is present by itself,
unless we think 'about' it. It's simply truth to present experience.
Composition is seeing where it is, in balanced relation with
everything else.
Unpracticed
people are unable to depict what they see, without something to refer
to directly. For example, how does an ash differ from an oak, or a
cauliflower? I remember a teacher in school saying; "And don't
make your trees look like glorified cabbages !" Now there's an
idea, though it wasn't wasted on me, already engaged in turning over
a new leaf.
So
if you're drawing directly from what you're seeing, 'one look equals
one line.' You can always erase it and correct it. That's the
opposite of a mistake, we learn by correcting mis-takes. I'll draw
the line there and go into the shadows.
Image
number two: SHADOW AREAS.
William
Blake is said to have said: "It's not so much the colour as
where the dark areas are put." (Approximate quote.) Shadow
areas follow contours, literally, as well as chronologically.
When
you fill in the shadow areas you already have the emergence of form
and volume. It's a nice way to start, as you already feel you're
making progress. A procedure is helpful because it helps you to know
how to proceed.
Shadows
are a deeper tone of the colour of the substance on which they fall.
So if you're starting with the shadows within foliage it's a darker
green, (mix a tiny touch of black with green. Or even its opposite,
violet, tentatively as that's a strong pigment, and opposite colours
neutralize one another.)
If
it's autumn, or rocks, or earth, dark brown is always a good
foundation for shadows and shadow pockets within contours.
You'll
see what it looks like in the photo. It's a nice feeling filling in
the shadows. Now you already have contrast and depth, the yin and
the yang. The polar parameters of wholeness.
So
you can take a tea break or whatever, comfortable in the knowledge
all is in order.
Image
number three: COLOUR/TEXTURE.
I
include colour and texture together as they're obviously not two
things usually. At least in nature they occur together. Colour is
the most luscious stage, as you're working with frequencies of
feeling, like when the bare bones and structures bloom and blossom
like flowers in summer.
I'm
well aware it's possible to paint using only colour, having explored
many diverse avenues.
What
i'm presenting here is an all purpose practical simplification of the
elements of drawing and painting combined. Just one conceptual triad
to serve as a guide for further free improvisation. There are no
rules, you're free to invent them or discard them.
Colour
is infinite permutations, combinations, of subtle modes of feeling
and associations like flavours of foods, aromas and moods of
frequencies of pitch and radiance, relational resonance as within the
realms of music, and i'm always patiently impatient to get to this
stage, where there's no area of blank canvas left to be accounted
for. Admittedly a typical occidental as opposed to an oriental
notion, and you can quote me on that, if you like.
But
all colour is relational, vibrating differently according to its
context, whether harmoniously or discordantly, just like people. You
can modulate and retune, fine-tuning and balancing one against
another, blending or mutating, and who's to say precisely where red
becomes orange and so on, all the way through the circular spectrum
of the rainbow?
Vincent
Van Gogh aspired to juxtaposing one pure naked colour against
another, approximating the depth of harmonious loving feeling of one
human for another and he did a pretty good job. Especially with the
sunflowers and the irises which continue to resonate in divine
sensual harmony despite silly irrelevant rumours that he didn't have
much of an ear.
So
forget "green is envy, red is anger, blue and green should never
be seen, because you're yellow and black is evil and i've got the
blues".
Or
that some colours "clash". When it's simply that they're
complimentaries of exactly the same tone, which is fascinating in
itself.
Because
these are all negative cliches of popular disinformation,
disseminated by uncreatively incurious and terminally wounded life
haters with jaded palettes who couldn't even tell you the exact
colour of a sour grape and need to balance their chakras. Enough to
make a rainbow cry!
So
to round it all off and bring the process to fully integrated
fruition, you bring the linear shadow tone back in. To fine-tune and
weave- in the "dragon lines" (Chinese term) and minute dots
and dashes of surface texture.
Binding
it all together like a tapestry of veins,
'arteries',
of rivers and streams through fertile land. The devil is not in the
detail but angels may well be.
You
behold the timeless tranquility of a living scene made manifest.
Reflected in the rippled surface of A LIQUID MIRROR.
"I
wish i had that gift", you say.
Well,
i just handed it to you. Didn't i ?
~~~
~~~ ~~~ ~~~
Makes
Rainbows~
Artwork:
A LIQUID MIRROR, martin law, 2014