On 23 December 2011 02:48, Martin Law <martin.rainbowmaker@gmail.com> wrote:
a nondualistic declaration of interdependence.
(food for "thought".)
recollecting present memory, incarnating into explicit duality,
individuating, organically responding to the intrusion of even the concept of two, imagining as a tree of life, healing and sealing the weal or wound from that which would sever.
individuating, organically responding to the intrusion of even the concept of two, imagining as a tree of life, healing and sealing the weal or wound from that which would sever.
wading through dense texts, thickets, and out across decades of dry etritus, crumbling to dust in metaphors of the split ends of paradox.
simultaneous,*2 knowing that knowing is not of the word, which is itself the illusory blade that only seems to unstitch the fabric.
be wary of the word which would seem to separate unsuspecting perception from indivisibility itself strung out in strings of literal latitude and suspect syntax.
that way ,it takes time to undo the knot of that which is not two, where the end undoes the means. while the whole,
being infinitely indivisible, has no parts.
definitions dare to divide, yet their seamless subjects, mutually arising, depend upon indispensable distinctness in common.
having no background as other, all, is not one. being beyond divisive definition of objects from spaces, there is no such thing as two. consisting within continuum as a comparative concept.
such being so, let words flow, painting pictures as you go. splitting atoms, splitting hairs, served with syntax he who dares. who can say, it is a tree, when, for you, you are a me. will the error ever cease, till this and that reside in peace. after all, it's only thought, that turns eternity to naught. so, put the books back on the shelf, life is living by itself. one plus one cannot be two, they are figments through and through.
lest anyone should call my bluff, i realize i've said enough.
~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~